The Edge of Reason

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

If a picture paints a thousand words—wait, that sounds too much like a Bread song. Everyone knows by now that a picture is worth a thousand words, but do people ever wonder about the power of the word? Letters are little more than loops and lines, and words are little more than combinations of letters, yet we can express the most profound thoughts and ideas using these symbols, and others know exactly what we mean.

As a bit of a bookworm, the importance of the word has never been lost on me. My reading began before I could even read when my parents read to me at home, and later at school before the classrooms were air conditioned, and the best way to stay cool was to sit still and listen to the teacher read. Something clicked in those early days and I’ve been reading since.

Imagine my chagrin, then, when I learned that some people want to ban certain books. I’ve since come to learn that essentially every good book has been challenged at some point or rather. Of late, there are of course Harry Potter and The Da Vinci Code. Both are among the best-sellers of all-time, yet small sects of society wish to deny everyone the basic right of reading them for enjoyment.

A bookless society is not an original idea. Ray Bradbury banged out Fahrenheit 451 over nine days in a library basement in the early 1950s. That book tells of a society where firemen are called not to put out fires, but to burn books. Instead of reading, residents sit in living rooms with wall-sized television screens and participate in the shows. The result? A brain-dead, conformist society that does as it’s told without asking questions. Not everyone can afford screens that large in 2007, but with so much “reality” programming and advertisements everywhere, Bradbury didn’t miss by much.

In Bradbury’s book, a curious neighbor dies, and the main character is told that asking questions leads to unhappiness, and that the girl is better off dead. Enter Aldous Huxley’s 1932 book Brave New World. The characters in that book have everything they need to be happy. Or do they? As infants, they are placed in a room with books and flowers, then shocked and scared as to be conditioned to fear both as adults. They are brainwashed in their sleep. Desire does not exist because they can have whomever they want whenever they want. And finally, should this not be enough, they have a miracle drug to ease the mind. Not one of Huxley’s characters ever swallowed a Prozac, but they sure gobbled up that soma!

While both of those books hit on the importance of art and literature for a deeper happiness, George Orwell’s 1984 takes it a step further. In that story, the language of the society is being rewritten by the Big Brother government to eliminate emotional expression. No longer can something be great, or super, or fantastic! Instead, it can be good, or doubleplusgood. Not quite the same, and the point is clear: words are more than simple communication. They are expression!

Finally, Kurt Vonnegut’s short story Harrison Bergeron tells of an egalitarian society where everyone is handicapped to the “lowest common denominator.” The intellectuals are subject to loud tones in a headset to prevent deep thought. Beautiful people are forced to cover themselves. The strong must carry extra weight to slow them down. While the story is profound enough, the low-budget movie of the same title has an even better dilemma: music is banned because it invokes passion, and impassioned people do crazy things. He who cannot play the piano may kill he who can in a fit of jealous rage!

All of these brilliant ideas expressed with a mere collection of black shapes on white paper. Ironically, it is often these types of books first on the ban lists, making them all the more clairvoyant. While I’ve never been so outraged by a word, and felt so self-righteous in my anger to want to deny it to everyone else, I am forced to wonder if that conditioning experiment in Brave New World was really fiction at all.

-Mike Courson

Labels: ,

Friday, August 10, 2007

24

I'm a Netflix subscriber and I rented the first disc of the TV series 24. I had heard about it some before from other people, but I must say it is really good. Excellent drama and action and production values are very high for a television series. I guess the secret agent thing hasn't been done to death.

Jenny (my fiancee) and I have been watching it and can't get enough. We went through the first disc in less than a day. I've frantically moved the series to the top of my list, so hopefully the next disc will come in soon.

The only complaint I have thus far is about the guy who plays the man running for president (looked it up, his name is Dennis Haisbert). It's not that he does a bad job (he's a good actor) it is just that thus far all I can think about is him talking about Allstate insurance. I guess it shows that (a) I watch the commercials and remember them and (b) sometimes selling yourself out to hock a product can undermine your acting ventures. Oh well, I'm sure he's getting paid well.

But, anyway, I'd recommend anyone who hasn't seen it to check out 24 at the earliest opportunity.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Brownback's campaign interfering with senate duties

Is Senator Brownback in? No, he's here or there campaigning to be
president. Oh, I thought he was supposed to be serving the people of Kansas
as a United States Senator. I hope we're not paying him to campaign...

The 2008 presidential election is already unlike any before it. Debates
began over a year and a half before the election, and campaigning has been
going on for at least two years. The prices of these campaigns are setting
new records by reaching into the tens of millions.

For certain candidates, your Obamas and Clintons on the left side, and,
well I don't know who on the right side, the campaigning can by justified.
These are the candidates leading in the polls. These are the candidates with
the sound byte each night on the evening news. For others, however, the
campaigns were over before they began, and each day the facade continues, it
is we the people who pay the price.

In Brownback's case, his campaigning has pulled him away from his
senatorial duties. Granted, Brownback is the religious right's candidate,
and they do have a disturbingly large say in American politics. However, one
needs more than a few votes to pull down this highest office in the world.
While Brownback was away from his paid job, he missed the vote on the ever
important minimum wage vote. Of course, he would have voted against it like
he had in the past, but at least then we could have called him on it. He
also missed a vote to give aid one of his consitituent towns in Greensburg.
How better to serve the people who got you there, huh? I would complain
more, but maybe his absence is a good thing...

Brownback's case can be multiplied many times over with these silly
campaigns. Governors, senators, and congressmen have all been pulled away
from the jobs we are paying them to do. It would be disappointing albeit
understandable if they had a chance, but all but few candidates on either
side really do. And what happens next election? The one after that? Will we
soon have continual campaigning, merely electing these people so that they
can use their position as a pedastal for the presidency? Let's hope not. Get
back to serving those who pay your salary.

-Mike Courson

Labels: , ,

Monday, August 6, 2007

Welcome to the blog

Hello everyone:

I've never written a blog before. I've done plenty of columns for the newspaper over the years, but never a blog. I guess the delivery method is different, but the medium is the same. From Gutenberg's printing press to Al Gore's Internet, may the written word never go out of style.

Perhaps I'm behind the times already with this blog stuff. I do read a few from time to time, but not regularly. They are interesting, but I've got enough going on with running a newspaper and working at Dillons. I guess it is just hard coming up with content for a bi-weekly newspaper, let alone a daily (or more) blog. With the unlimited space the Internet provides, I'm free to ramble more, though, so that's a good thing, right? But I guess attention spans are even less online than they are in print (I just made that up, but it sounds logical). So I'll try to keep this stuff fairly to the point, if there is one. Today, I don't really have one, other than just to try this thing out and introduce you to it. I usually am more cohesive in my writing. I tried a free-writing exercise this summer during a class in Stress Management. This post is bringing back memories of that.


I tried going with a more "sophisticated" blog, but dang, WordPress was about the most complicated thing I've ever seen to install. Writing is writing, I suppose, so for now I'll try the much simpler "Blogger." Perhaps later someone else can figure it out for me and I can move this thing to the more complicated software. But alas, for another day.

Yes, so back to the point at hand. This blog will be published on The Online Edge website. I figure I can update this from time to time between issues of the paper to keep our website more interesting. I may just ramble, like today, or I may have a point. I guess I'll see how I'm feeling at the time. I wonder if anyone will read it? Hopefully, you will. And comment on it, too. That is one of the features I'm really looking forward to with the blog format. The ability to comment on it freely and immediately really sets this off from print (I've probably gotten a total of 5 letters to the editor in over 2 years printing The Edge). Feel free to agree or disagree with me, but please don't leave spam. No one likes that stuff. It sucks, big-time.

In other news, I'm officially a graduate of Fort Hays State. I now have a bachelor's in psychology. Yes, after finishing some classes this summer, I went to the registrars office today and they'll be sending me the degree in the mail soon (but not before they charged me another $30. Honestly, I've already spent 3 years and thousands of dollars going to school there, couldn't they at least give you the degree for free? One more chance to sock it to ya, I guess). I'll probably write more about that in the next paper on the 20th.

Well, to the two or three of you reading this, until next time!

-Zach Becker

Labels: , ,